Rod Lyall 28/01/24
The siren-call of grade inflation is once again being heard in Dutch cricket.
For those who don’t know, grade inflation is the process by which students are given higher marks than their work justifies in order to make them feel better and to make it look as if the system is stronger than it is.
Its cricketing form is currently circulating in relation to the Dutch competition, where a group of clubs led by Salland are pushing for a restructuring which would double the number of pools in the Overgangsklasse (really the fourth division) from two to four, or from 16 teams to 32.
Not content with this, the proponents of the scheme are proposing that the third division (a.k.a. the Eerste Klasse) should be doubled from ten teams to 20 from 2025, with the Overgangsklasse then renamed the Tweede Klasse.
The effect of all this is to push teams which are not good enough to gain promotion by their own efforts on the field up the competition tree, so that they have the illusion that they are playing at a higher level when in fact all they are doing is lowering the overall standard.
It was a mistake which was made by the previous Board – full disclosure, of which I was a member – in 2016 when, against all advice from players and senior administrators, it increased the number of teams in the Topklasse from eight to ten.
The argument then was that it would relieve clubs’ fear of relegation, that it would encourage bringing more young players into sides, and that it would, feeding down the divisions, enable clubs to claim that they were playing at a higher level than they otherwise would have been.
But the truth is that it reduced the playing standard in the top divisions, and with a few notable exceptions, it has not increased clubs’ willingness to develop younger sides – you only had to watch last year’s Hoofdklasse final between Hermes-DVS and Quick Haag to register how few promising young players they have been able to produce.
The bogus claim in the new proposals that they are needed to enable talented cricketers to play at their true level conveniently ignores the fact that the KNCB has for decades operated a promotion-and-relegation system which means that if a team is good enough it can work its way up the divisions.
And that now goes double, with the separation last year of the promotion-and-relegation systems for 50-over and T20 cricket, which already meant that different sides (Salland and ACC respectively) dropped down to this season’s Hoofdklasse in the two formats.
So what is to be gained by elevating half the teams in last season’s Tweede Klasse into a new-look, four-pool Overgangsklasse?
Would Pool C, for example, really be stronger for the presence of Centurions 2, Kampong 4 and Salland 2, none of whom was able to finish higher than fourth in their Tweede Klasse group last year?
And what is the benefit to anyone, including the teams themselves, of saving from relegation Den Helder, Zwolle, Olympia and Wanica Star, all of whom finished bottom of their pools in last season’s Tweede Klasse?
The one positive thing which can be said about the scheme is that more teams in a division means that the pools can be structured to reduce travelling times, which is no inconsiderable factor in the lower levels of recreational cricket, which is, to be honest, what we’re talking about here.
Domestic cricket competitions in serious cricket nations – which, for the sake of argument, let us suppose the Netherlands to be – serve two purposes: they enable as many people as possible to enjoy a regular game of cricket at the appropriate level for their talent and skills, and they provide a framework for the most talented players to hone their skills, equipping them for the step up to the international stage.
It’s a fair question whether the Dutch domestic competition does the latter at all well.
Yes, more locally-produced players have made the grade recently than for a few years, with the likes of Bas de Leede, Vikram Singh and Aryan Dutt establishing themselves successfully in the national team, but overall the Topklasse competition contains too few local players of genuine quality to sustain ten teams: Salland were able to stay up for as long as they did by shipping in German internationals, other clubs have drawn in talent from Belgium, and still the average number of players capable of achieving a modest average of 20.00 with the bat or 25.00 with the ball is about eight per team.
That means that there are 30 or so players in the Topklasse every week who are basically making up the numbers, and it’s not as if there battalions of young cricketers in lower-division clubs being prevented from joining their ranks.
An ideal structure is a pyramid, attuned to the amount of talent available: in the Netherlands, with barely 2000 adult male players, that would probably be three top divisions of eight, two fourth-division pools of eight, and below that divisions of perhaps four pools, geographically organised as far as possible.
Roughly the system, in other words, we had between 2011 and 2016, before the Board listened to the siren’s first haunting cries.
Oh, and to that a sensible governing body would add a proper regional competition of, say, three teams, enabling the best players to strut their stuff in contests tougher than most matches in the club league are capable of being.
But one thing should be absolutely clear: you can’t turn a broom cupboard into a splendid dining room by changing the label on the door, all you do is re-emphasise the fact that it’s a broom cupboard.

















































































